Buscar este blog
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta DAPA. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta DAPA. Mostrar todas las entradas
lunes, 21 de octubre de 2019
Which Immigration Cases Will The Supreme Court Rule On This Session?
By Katie Rane www.immigrationimpact.com
Etiquetas:
DACA,
DAPA,
Due Process & the Courts,
Employment Authorization,
Federal Courts/Jurisdiction,
immigration cases,
Supreme Court,
Supreme Court Sesion
lunes, 19 de noviembre de 2018
DACA Is Still In Effect As It Heads To The Supreme Court
Written by Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stinging rebuke to President Trump’s ongoing efforts to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative last week, unanimously upholding a lower court injunction which had blocked the Trump administration from ending the program.
Just three days before that hearing, the Department of Justice (DOJ) took the unusual step of asking the Supreme Court to bypass the appeals process and hear the DACA case before the Ninth Circuit issued a decision. Now that the Ninth Circuit has ruled, the Supreme Court could take up the case as early as next spring—with DACA remaining in effect until they rule.
Back in September 2017, the administration announced that it would be ending DACA, the initiative which allows undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children to receive temporary permission to remain in the country. Multiple lawsuits challenging the termination of DACA soon followed.
In one of those challenges, a federal court in San Francisco found that the administration’s termination of DACA was “based on a flawed legal premise” and ordered the government to continue processing renewal applications. Courts in New York and the District of Columbia soon followed suit with similar orders, which remain on appeal.
The Ninth Circuit’s decision concluded the same. Though DOJ had argued the original DACA initiative was illegal and unconstitutional—supposedly giving the agency no legal ability to review or continue the program—the court found differently. The Ninth Circuit determined that it had the authority to review and reject the administration’s conclusions as to whether DACA was legal.
Noting that many previous presidents (including Eisenhower, Reagan, and H.W. Bush) had provided discretionary immigration benefits to large groups, the Ninth Circuit declared that DACA “was a permissible exercise of executive discretion.” Since the administration had offered essentially no other reason for ending DACA beyond its claim that DACA was illegal, the Ninth Circuit held that the government had improperly ended DACA.
Importantly, the Ninth Circuit was clear that the administration could have chosen to end DACA as a matter of discretion at any time—but had chosen not to, instead relying on the legal conclusion that it simply had no authority to continue the initiative. It is possible that the administration chose not to use its discretion to end DACA because in doing so it would have been forced to admit it was legal.
Although judges ruled 3-0 against the government, at least one judge on the Ninth Circuit would have gone even further. In a concurring opinion, Judge Owens declared that the plaintiffs should have been granted an injunction due to the administration’s “unconstitutional racial animus” against DACA holders. Most DACA beneficiaries are Latino, people who have borne the brunt of the president’s attacks on immigrants.
Now that the Ninth Circuit has ruled, the case is directly on path to the Supreme Court. Until the Supreme Court issues a decision, individuals who have DACA can continue to apply for DACA renewals and the government will continue to process them. If the Supreme Court accepts the case, it is likely that a decision would come at the end of the term in June. Until then, the initiative remains in place.
Última Actualización: Noviembre 19 de 2018
Fuente: www.immigrationimpact.com
Etiquetas:
Benefits & Relief,
DACA,
DAPA,
Department of Justice,
Donald Trump,
featured,
Federal Courts/Jurisdiction,
Ninth Circuit,
Supreme Court
lunes, 26 de junio de 2017
Los Dreamers Pueden Quedarse, Sus Padres Están Sin Protección
Amigo/a,
En otra jugada para implementar la fuerza de deportación masiva de Trump, la administración Trump oficialmente retiró la política de inmigración que le habría permitido a padres de niños ciudadanos de EE.UU. y residentes permanentes legales que han estado viviendo, trabajando, educando a sus familias y contribuyendo a la economía de EE.UU. protección de la deportación.
Como parte de esa declaración sobre el retiro de la Acción Diferida para Padres de estadounidenses y Residentes Permanentes Legales (DAPA, por sus siglas en inglés), también fue una declaración de que la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA, por sus siglas en inglés) permanecerá de hecho en vigor, por ahora. Solamente una verdadera reforma migratoria la haría permanente.
El anuncio sobre DAPA no tiene impacto alguno sobre DACA.
Debido a esto, se nos recuerda que DACA es solamente una solución temporal. También nos recuerda que son las altas voces de los Dreamers y aliados como usted influyeron para que Trump rompiera su promesa de campaña de terminar inmediatamente con el programa.
Juntos, continuaremos protegiendo a las familias inmigrantes y resistiendo todos los ataques contra nuestra comunidad.
iAmerica
Copyright © 2017 iAmerica
All rights reserved.
Fuente: http://iamerica.org/es
http://inmigracionyvisas.com/a3647-Dreamers-Pueden-Quedarse-en-Estados-Unidos.html
miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2016
Colleges Rally to the Defense of Undocumented Students
Written by Maurice Belanger
Among the many things President-elect Donald Trump has promised is undo President Obama’s executive action protecting young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children, also known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
What happens next is complicated. It’s easy to talk about deporting these young people in the abstract. As Libby Schaaf, Mayor of Oakland, California, recently told the New York Times:
“We do have many undocumented immigrants, but often these are residents who came to our city as toddlers. They have grown up here and gone to our public schools,” Ms. Schaaf said. “These are not illegal aliens, they are friends’ children, people sitting next to us in our church pews and on the bus. Here it feels much more personal.”
It is not surprising that the public, institutions, and even cities and towns are rallying to defend their undocumented neighbors, students, and residents. Among the institutions mobilizing to defend undocumented students are the nation’s colleges and universities.
As of November 30, about 400 colleges and universities have signed on to a “Statement in Support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program and our Undocumented Immigrant Students. ” The statement, addressed to “our country’s leaders,” reads in part:
“…DACA should be upheld, continued, and expanded. … This is both a moral imperative and a national necessity. America needs talent — and these students … are already part of our national community. They represent what is best about America, and as scholars and leaders they are essential to the future. The effort to have education leaders sign-on to this statement is organized by Pomona College in California which includes all of the country’s Ivy League Universities and the largest four-year public university system, the California State Universities.
Former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, now president of the University of California, alongside Timothy White, Chancellor of the California State University system and Eloy Ortiz Oakley, Chancellor-Designate of California Community Colleges, sent a letter to President-elect Trump, urging him to continue the DACA program.
The letter states that thousands of DACA students studying in the colleges and universities in the three systems “should be able to pursue their dream of higher education without fear of being arrested, deported, or rounded up for just trying to learn.”
This extraordinary show of support for DACA comes after students across the country have been organizing to pressure their schools to protect undocumented students. United We Dream, the nation’s largest immigrant youth-led organization, and Voto Latino announced a partnership to organize young people to create “sanctuary college campuses and … a welcoming climate of tolerance.” In the aftermath of the election one thing is clear: President-elect Trump knows how to use the media to send a populist message. But what message would he be sending by throwing roadblocks in front of ambitious, young students who are pursuing their education and using their work authorization to contribute to our economy?
The public does not support punishing these young people nor is it sound economic or immigration policy, President-elect Trump should recognize that.
Photo Courtesy of The LEAF Project.
Source: ImmigrationImpact.com
http://inmigracionyvisas.com/a3485-Defense-of-Undocumented-Students.html
viernes, 29 de abril de 2016
Acción Ejecutiva DAPA y DACA En Manos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
Compartimos el video del canal canalestrellatv programa En la Lucha, donde un republicano y un demócrata dan el punto de vista sobre la Acción Ejecutiva y los alivios migratorios prometidos por el Presidente Obama. El Lunes 18 de abril 2016, iniciaron los argumentos en la Corte Suprema de Justicia de los Estados Unidos.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)