Short-term thinking is inferior to long-term thinking,some argue, because it does a disservice to the future and those who will live it. Two long-term thinkers who have profoundly impacted U.S. immigration policy were recently in the headlines: John Tanton and Cordelia Scaife May.
Both helped give rise to the current immigration “restrictionist” movement in America through four decades of building and funding a network to advance their cause.
May died in 2005. However, the New York Times recentlyunpacked her legacy in printand on its podcast,The Daily. May was a key partner to Tanton, providing the funding to prop up the research and advocacy activities of his restrictionist groups. They left behind awell-financed network.
Since FAIR’s founding in 1979, the network has argued that America needed to “restrict” who came into the United States in order to control population growth and other environmental concerns. However, while the network claims their policies are not animated by racial animus, Tanton’s writings, revealed late in his life, tell a different story.
In 1993, he famously wrote, “I’ve come to the point of view that for European-American society and culture to persist requires a European-American majority, and a clear one at that.” He also shareddire warnings of a “Latin”onslaught that needed to be stopped.
More dangerous than policymaking alone, the network hasworked to persuade the publicand advance a narrative that the nation is under threat from newcomers through theirwork in the mediaand public square. They have played on the public’s biases and fears for decades and encouraged Americans to turn their backs on newcomers and to fear diversity.
Today, the leaders groomed by this network sit inkey officeswithin immigration agencies and evenin the White House. Their long-standing plans for severe restrictions on who can enter the country are beginning to take hold.
In just the last few years,their acolyteshave placed unnecessary and burdensome hurdles in front of newcomers. One of the most recent is the Trump administration’snew public charge rule, which makes it far easier for the government to deny entry to someone based on their perceived economic status. This now means only privileged individuals have a shot at the American dream.
By mainstreaming their restrictionist views, they have even primed some of the public to accept and even support these restrictive, cruel, and un-American policies. Increasingly Americans seeimmigration as a problemand not an opportunity.
What we now see play out every day on immigration policy is no accident. It’s the result of a long-term vision of a nation that strictly limits who may enter.
All Americans who are concerned with America’s legacy and future must take a step back and assess how we have been countering the restrictionist movement and what new strategies we need to roll back their impact and advance the vision of the America we want to live in. We must act quickly before the United States abandons this legacy and becomes a fundamentally unwelcoming nation.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario